Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

HR

HUGOTON ROYALTY TRUST (HGTXU)·Q1 2024 Earnings Summary

Executive Summary

  • Q1 2024 produced zero net proceeds and no distributions as lower natural gas prices, higher production expense and overhead, and continued excess-cost carryforwards offset revenues; distributable income per unit was $0.000000 (vs $0.254394 in Q1 2023) .
  • Underlying revenues fell 59% year over year to $11.39M on gas price compression ($3.80/Mcf vs $10.56/Mcf) despite higher oil volumes/prices mix, driving net profits income to $0 (vs $10.46M in Q1 2023) .
  • Excess-cost balances remained a gating factor (total NPI net $3.45M at 3/31/24), with mixed movement by conveyance (OK declined on recoveries; KS and WY rose) .
  • No earnings call or formal guidance; monthly press releases reiterated suspended distributions for Jan–Mar due to excess costs and documented ongoing development spend at Major County wells (non‑operated) .
  • Subsequent event (June 18 settlement with XTO) offsets Chieftain and overhead claims, leaves $0.83M production cost to OK conveyance and provides a $0.5M advance (liquidity), potentially a near-term narrative shift once applied to accounting going forward .

What Went Well and What Went Wrong

  • What Went Well

    • Oklahoma conveyance saw net recoveries of excess costs in Q1, aiding partial improvement of the excess-cost position (OK NPI excess costs fell to $0.69M at 3/31/24 from $1.12M at 12/31/23) .
    • Oil production rose 25% YoY on new Major County wells (48,791 Bbls vs 39,047), partially cushioning revenue declines from gas price weakness .
    • Development costs decreased 69% YoY on timing of non‑operated well spend ($0.55M vs $1.75M) .
  • What Went Wrong

    • Gas prices fell 64% YoY ($3.80/Mcf vs $10.56/Mcf), cutting gas sales revenue by 68% ($7.87M vs $24.47M) and driving net profits income to $0 .
    • Production expense rose 16% YoY (labor, P&A, pipeline costs), and overhead increased 9% YoY, pressuring net proceeds amid price weakness .
    • Trust liquidity remained strained; cash reserve drew down to $120K and management highlighted substantial doubt about going concern absent financing or net profits recovery .

Financial Results

MetricQ1 2023Q3 2023Q4 2023Q1 2024
Total Revenues (Underlying) ($)$27,550,145 $9,780,241 $15,701,600 $11,388,171
Net Proceeds ($)$13,074,691 $0 $0 $0
Net Profits Income ($)$10,459,753 $0 $0 $0
Distributable Income per Unit ($)$0.254394 $0.000000 $0.000000 $0.000000
Avg Gas Price ($/Mcf)$10.56 $2.80 $3.37 $3.80
Avg Oil Price ($/Bbl)$79.00 $72.10 $77.16 $72.17
Gas Volumes – Underlying (Mcf)2,317,037 2,313,603 2,465,801 2,068,643
Oil Volumes – Underlying (Bbls)39,047 45,936 95,885 48,791

Segment-like view (Excess Costs – NPI net)

Conveyance (NPI Net)12/31/20233/31/2024
Kansas$398,141 $791,838
Oklahoma$1,115,989 $692,946
Wyoming$1,375,032 $1,676,146
Total Excess Costs (NPI)$2,889,162 $3,160,930
Accrued Interest (NPI)$214,976 $284,306

Key cost drivers (Q1 2024 vs Q1 2023): taxes/transport down 51%; production expense up 16%; development costs down 69%; overhead up 9% .

Guidance Changes

MetricPeriodPrevious GuidanceCurrent UpdateChange
Monthly DistributionJan–Mar 2024None provided$0.000000 declared for Jan, Feb, Mar; reserve used for expenses Maintained suspension
2024 Development Costs (Underlying)FY 2024≈ $3M budgeted (10‑K) Unchanged; continued spend on four non‑operated OK wells (completed by Q1’24) Maintained
Expense ReserveQ1 2024$344,048 at 12/31/23 $120,303 at 3/31/24 (reserve used $223,745) Lower
Legal/Arbitration (Subsequent Event)Effective 6/1/24Settlement: Net $830,381 production cost to OK conveyance; $500,000 advance to replenish liquidity New (post‑Q1)

Note: The Trust does not provide revenue/margin/EPS guidance; distributions depend on monthly net proceeds and reserve management .

Earnings Call Themes & Trends

(No earnings call or transcript available for Q1 2024.) [functions.ListDocuments result: 0 earnings-call-transcript]

TopicPrevious Mentions (Q3 2023, Q4 2023)Current Period (Q1 2024)Trend
Distributions/Excess CostsDistributions suspended; all 3 conveyances in excess costs; reserve utilization; going‑concern flagged Jan–Mar: no distributions; reserve used monthly; mixed excess-cost movements by state Continued suspension; excess cost volatility
Commodity PricesQ3: gas price $2.80/Mcf; Q4: $3.37/Mcf; pressure vs 2022 Q1: gas $3.80/Mcf (still -64% YoY); oil $72.17/Bbl (-9% YoY) Modest q/q gas improvement, YoY compression
Development Activity3 non‑operated OK wells in 2023; fourth expected in Q1 2024; elevated dev costs in 2023 Fourth well completed; dev costs fell YoY on timing Project completion; spend tapering
Liquidity/Going ConcernSubstantial doubt cited; exploring financing options Reserve down to $120K; going‑concern reiterated Liquidity strain persists
ArbitrationChieftain allocation risk highlighted; OK excess costs could rise No Q1 resolution; subsequent June settlement rebalances claims Post‑Q1 settlement could improve clarity

Management Commentary

  • “Accumulated excess costs ... have resulted in insufficient net proceeds to the Trust and a reduction in the Trust’s expense reserve. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Trust’s ability to continue as a going concern” .
  • On quarterly drivers: “Net profits income was $0 compared to $10,459,753 for first quarter 2023… primarily the result of lower gas and oil prices ($12.7 million)… increased production expenses ($0.6 million)… increased overhead ($0.2 million)” .
  • Monthly update tone: “There would not be a cash distribution… due to the excess cost positions on all three of the Trust’s conveyances of net profits interests” (Jan/Feb/Mar releases) .

Q&A Highlights

  • The Trust did not host an earnings call or Q&A for Q1 2024; no transcript is available [functions.ListDocuments result: 0 earnings-call-transcript].

Estimates Context

  • Wall Street consensus (S&P Global) for Q1 2024 revenue/EPS was unavailable at the time of analysis (either no coverage or data access limit reached). As such, no vs‑consensus comparisons are provided [functions.GetEstimates errors].

Where estimates may need to adjust:

  • Given zero net proceeds and distributions, any models assuming near‑term resumption of distributions likely need to push out timing and reflect updated excess‑cost balances and weaker realized gas prices .

KPIs

KPIQ1 2023Q3 2023Q4 2023Q1 2024
Gas Sales Revenue ($)24,465,370 6,468,254 8,302,933 7,866,852
Oil Sales Revenue ($)3,084,775 3,311,987 7,398,667 3,521,319
Gas Volumes – Underlying (Mcf)2,317,037 2,313,603 2,465,801 2,068,643
Oil Volumes – Underlying (Bbls)39,047 45,936 95,885 48,791
Avg Gas Price ($/Mcf)10.56 2.80 3.37 3.80
Avg Oil Price ($/Bbl)79.00 72.10 77.16 72.17
Production Expense ($)4,619,008 4,299,551 5,178,180 5,360,017
Overhead ($)3,064,511 3,361,650 3,373,745 3,348,776

Guidance Changes and Distributions Detail (within Q1)

MonthDistribution per UnitCash Reserve ChangeNotable Ops Detail
January 2024$0.000000 Reserve -$19,000 Dev costs $43k; prod exp $2.353M; overhead $1.060M
February 2024$0.000000 Reserve -$26,000 Dev costs $169k; prod exp $1.073M; overhead $1.161M
March 2024$0.000000 Reserve -$179,000 Dev costs $338k; prod exp $1.934M; overhead $1.128M

Key Takeaways for Investors

  • Distributions remain suspended; Q1 distributable income per unit was $0.000000 as excess costs and expenses consumed underlying revenues .
  • Natural gas price sensitivity is the primary swing factor; Q1 gas price of $3.80/Mcf was down 64% YoY and remains the main driver of revenue compression .
  • Excess-cost trajectory is mixed by state (improved in OK, worsened in KS and WY in Q1); recovery sequence across conveyances will dictate timing to resume distributions .
  • Development program in Major County (four non‑operated wells) has largely completed, with Q1 showing lower development costs; ongoing operating cost control will be critical .
  • Liquidity is tight (reserve ~$120k at quarter end) and going‑concern risk persists absent net proceeds improvement or financing; the subsequent $500k advance via settlement adds near‑term cushion but will be recouped from future net proceeds .
  • The June 18 settlement simplifies lingering arbitration issues, nets down Chieftain and overhead claims, and clarifies future overhead accounting, potentially reducing uncertainty in future net proceeds calculations .
  • Near‑term trading likely hinges on: realized gas price recovery, further excess‑cost recoveries in OK, stabilization of production expense/overhead, and how quickly the settlement effects flow through distributions .